Making a Skeptic Consider…

I admit it, I’m a skeptic. I’m one of the first people to discount a new “management by best seller” theory. Likewise, I approach each new training theory with the same skepticism.

Years ago, I was working for a corporation that bought whole-heartedly into what was called at the time “adult learning theory.” I know it still exists, but I’m sure its gone through various permutations by now.

During the period I’m referring to, we had to develop a plan for a class that engaged as many sensory processes as possible. In other words, we had to have music playing prior to class, during activities and breaks. We had to have the walls of the classroom covered with a variety of images and posters – some relevant to the class, more that weren’t. The general theory was that adult learners needed to have time to check out of learning. Supposedly, with the proper stimuli, their attention would be more engaged, and they’d be likely to retain information.

That’s why Eric Jensen’s article, “Brain-Based Learning: A Reality Check” caught my attention.  Jensen looks at brain research and some of the myths and realities that have resulted from this field of research.  As an example, Jensen sites the “Baby Mozart” study.  The original researchers, Shaw and Rausher, indicated only a slight improvement of spatial reasoning (Rauscher, Shaw, and Ky, 1993). While they never claimed that listening to Mozart would make for dramatic changes in intelligence, the media and capitalists clamored over the study.

Jensen contends that while the “Baby Mozart” craze was just that, a craze — there was some important research that was overlooked from this and other ancillary studies. Specifically, that early, long term music instruction does have a positive impact on learning, memory and intelligence.

I think Jensen has a great point: brain research is constantly changing and improving our understanding of the brain, and information processing. While it’s easy to b skeptical, or discount new ideas, there’s significant research that is relevant and provides information we can use to create better educational experiences and training materials.

Another great example of how research is changing our approach to education or training is the self-paced learning model.  Twenty years ago, I was developing paper-based training modules upon the theory that adult learners would work their way through training materials as their need for understanding of a topic created a demand.

I found an article by Reinhard Oppermann and Christop G. Thomas to be of interest. Their article “Learning and Problem Solving as an Iterative Process: Learning Living Repository: LEAR” references their learning system (LEAR). While the article explores their learning process, I did find that many of their theories are relevant to developing training programs. Oppermann and Thomas state the learning on demand is an excellent strategy to employee for adult learners. Like the original self-paced modules, their method of learning depend on the motivation of the employee, just with a much higher tech, computer generated approach.

It’s interesting to study the way learners engage with training and how their brains function. I’m looking forward to learning and exploring more approaches to learning. It’s a whole new world of instructional design, and I’m just getting started.

Resources:

Jensen, Eric (2000). Brain-Based Learning: A Reality Check. Educational leadership, 57, n7, pg: 76-80.

Oppermann, Reinhard, and Thomas, Christoph G. Learning and Problem Solving as an Iterative Process: Learners’ Living Repository: LEAR.  Retrieved from http//http://ui4all.ics.forth.gr/UI4ALL-95/oppermann.pdf.

Advertisements

Let the Blogging Begin

I’m very excited to be working on my Master’s Degree in Instructional Design. I’m looking forward to studying learning theories and creating effective On-Line Training programs. As part of this process, I’m beginning a blog about Instructional Design.

I work with World Vision, an international organization. I’m especially interested in exploring ideas various adult learning theories, but I wonder about how motivation of learners and theories about what appeals to learners in online training changes with international users.

I found several great blogs by instructional designers which provide information on different aspects of training and instructional design.

The first blog looks at the process for creating job aids. I find users are constantly looking for job aids, many times preferring a quick step by step guide to a complete training course. I appreciate the thoughts about effectiveness of job aids and the learning process. Check out this blog to learn more:

http://tonishirleyidt.wordpress.com/2012/09/08/the-anti-course-an-instructional-job-aid/

Next, I’m really interested in the development of online training, and how to motivate and encourage online learners. I think this blog does a great job of looking at the behaviors of online learners. Of course, I’m also interested in exploring how these behaviors change when working with international students. To learn more about this topic, please explore the blog below:

http://onlinelearninginsights.wordpress.com/2012/09/07/how-to-encourage-online-learners-to-take-responsibility-for-their-own-learning/

Next, I’m going to  stick with my international leaner issues and look for an exploration of what type of learning is more effective, multimedia presentations versus the traditional text learning process. I think the blog below offers an interesting perspective. I do find that most of our users are very sophisticated about their demands for content. Although this blog indicates that there’s not a great deal of difference in learning outcomes, I find that the sophistication level of the learner is almost always synonymous with a multimedia presentation. I am interested in exploring how the multimedia presentation must change for an international audience, especially those that are viewing a presentation in English as their second language.  I’ve found that these learners look for far more detail than what we’ve expected from most multimedia presentations. We are conditioned to believe that simpler is better, and we’ve found that’s not always the case with the international learner.

To explore this topic further, please click on the following link:

http://learningandeducationnewsnetwork.wordpress.com/2012/09/09/higher-order-cognitive-skills-improvement-multimedia-vs-text/

Finally, I look forward to exploring the blogosphere even further. Thanks for following along as I dip my toes in to this process.